Summary
The paper would concentrate on the US Old-Age Insurance program with side comments on
the survivors, disability, and medicare programs. The thrust of the paper would be that the
fundamentals of the current system were well thought out before the programs were enacted,
that the system has served well, that the current attention to "fix" the program is unnecessary and
perhaps politically rather than logically motivated, and that suggestions to
change the program to an individual investment accumulation would both do
violence to some fundamental goals and possibly not lead the expected results of the proponents. It is possible
that these thoughts would be of interest to actuaries from other countries who are helping to
design social programs for their country.
|