Making our voice heard: A more prominent role for the Actuarial Profession in public policymaking

What are the levers of attractiveness of long-term care insurance that we need to act on? In France, the creation of a 5th branch of Social Security dedicated to autonomy is a significant step forward. However public finances will not be able to assume the costs linked to the loss of autonomy of all our fellow citizens and families will not have all the financial resources to absorb the remaining expenses of their elders. These issues undeniably argue for the use of insurance solutions to support the public authorities. It is therefore essential that we, as actuaries, continue to work on making our long-term care products more desirable and durable. This workshop will be an opportunity to present an overview of the long-term care insurance market, highlighting in particular the issues, practices, market projects and prospects specific to this risk.

Taxation, regional regulations and certain exogenous factors might affect a plan sponsor’s interpretation, approaches and success in achieving sustainability of their defined benefit plan. Rules regarding the design, funding and taxation of most defined benefit plans are regional, typically by country, or perhaps by state or province. The rules usually focus on encouraging sponsorship and participation, and/or ensuring sufficient funding. There are often other goals, such as limiting tax deductions or preventing discrimination by age, gender, pay-level, etc. While they may be well-intended, the rules can often constrain a sponsor’s ability to implement effective, long-term policies that seek to optimize plan sustainability. Layered on top of the general rules are often tax laws that can influence or reward sponsor and participant actions. These incentives, or sometimes disincentives, can lead to sponsor and participant choices that might be counter to a plan’s optimal path to sustainability. In addition, an organization’s approach to plan sustainability could be constrained by exogenous factors, such as: prioritization of short-term financial results diverting from long-term funding; demographic aging if benefit costs (intentionally or unintentionally) rely on intergenerational cross-subsidies; long-term global trends affecting capital market returns, long-term return expectations or inflation experience; and mortality improvements. The paper will examine how these constraints can affect a plan’s sustainability, how a sponsoring organization might better achieve sustainability if unconstrained, and a case study of the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund, which operates free of certain constraints that exist for plans operating under regional regulations and/or taxation regimes.

Botswana’s launch of a National Health Insurance (NHI) in 2025 marks a pivotal step toward universal, equitable healthcare. This report evaluates two benefit tiers—a comprehensive package aligned with private Medical Aid Schemes and a streamlined essential package—against the country’s current financing and service delivery landscape. Through actuarial costing and scenario modeling, we compare projected costs with revenue options, including modest tax adjustments and reallocation of existing health budgets. Our analysis highlights key funding, equity considerations across different population groups, and operational challenges. We then propose a pragmatic, phased roadmap—combining efficiency enhancements, blended financing strategies, and clear eligibility rules—to establish a sustainable NHI that improves access and shields households from high out-of-pocket expenses. Finally, we introduce the idea of a Special Health Risks Insurance (SHRI) overlay, but intentionally refrain from exploring its detailed design within this report.

Actuaries are busily trying to catch up with developments in Data Science and Artificial Intelligence. We cannot escape the feeling that we as a profession were caught by surprise. We have been a bit late, hopefully not fatally yet. The next revolution is waiting just around the corner. This comes in the form of Quantum Computing (QC). Will actuaries be ready to make use of it from day one? Full-scale adoption of QC still faces several technical challenges. There is however strong belief that QC will be reality in less than ten years. Today we mostly encounter QC with threats to today’s practices in cryptography. QC will make most of today’s practices insufficient (although there are some initiatives that are thought to be QC-proof). There will however be vast benefits from QC outside cryptography. QC will make it possible to do things that with today’s tools would be impossible (often solving problems in the so-called NP class). Or, they would be impossible in any realistic timescale even with computers get